James Whitfield
James Whitfield Political analyst and journalist
Olivia Julianna

Abortion Rights · Gen-Z Activism · August 2022

Olivia Julianna: How a Texas Teen Turned Matt Gaetz’s Mockery Into $2.1 Million

A U.S. Congressman called her “odious” and mocked the way she looked. She turned his tweet into a fundraising record. This is what those 72 hours actually felt like.

August 9, 2022 — 11:47 p.m. CDT

Olivia Julianna is sitting on her bedroom floor in Houston, Texas, back against the bed frame, laptop open. She is 19 years old. She has been awake for eighteen hours. On the screen in front of her is a tweet from a sitting member of the United States House of Representatives. He is describing her body.

She reads it again.

Matt Gaetz, Republican of Florida, had posted the tweet five hours earlier, at 6:42 p.m. He called her “odious.” He made remarks about her appearance that were specific enough that people who saw them immediately understood what kind of man sends a message like that to a teenage girl who disagreed with him on Twitter.

She hits refresh on the ActBlue fundraising page she set up an hour after seeing it.

$17,423.

She hits it again.

$17,423.

Then $18,110.

Her phone has not stopped vibrating since six o’clock. She puts it face-down. Picks it up. Puts it down again.

What she does not yet know — what no one in that bedroom knows — is that she is about seven hundred thousand dollars away from the single hour that will change everything. She does not know that, by the time she finally sleeps, the number will have climbed past four hundred thousand dollars. She does not know that journalists will call. That her Twitter following, sitting at a respectable but modest count for a Democratic Party organizer, will multiply several times over in seventy-two hours. She does not know any of that yet. She knows only the number on the screen, and the congressman who made it possible.

Here is what she had said to Gaetz in the first place: not much. She had posted something critical of him on Twitter, the kind of sharp-edged political commentary that characterizes her entire feed, the voice of someone who had been organizing for Democratic causes since 2020, who had spoken at the Democratic National Committee, who considered herself, at nineteen, a serious political actor. Gaetz had not engaged with the argument. He had gone after the person making it.

This is how the story begins. Not with a plan. With a decision made in under an hour, while she was still furious, to turn a congressman’s cruelty into something else.

“Post about what he did,” she would say later, describing her reasoning in those first minutes. “And give people somewhere to put their anger.” She set up the ActBlue page, linked it to abortion funds operating in Texas — organizations that had spent the previous year working under Senate Bill 8, the state’s heartbeat law that banned most abortions at around six weeks — and put the link in her Twitter bio. Then she watched the number.

Fundraising progression — 72 hours, August 9–12, 2022

$2,100,000

Raised for abortion funds in 72 hours

Hour 0 $17,423
Hour 12 $400,000
Hour 36 $1,200,000
Hour 72 $2,100,000

Funds directed to Texas abortion rights organizations via ActBlue. The $2.1M total represented the largest single viral fundraising moment for abortion causes on record at the time. Gaetz deleted his original tweet; the fundraising page remained active.

The Congressman Deleted the Tweet. The Money Kept Coming.

Matt Gaetz is not the first powerful man to discover, too late, that contempt is a kind of accelerant. He deleted the tweet. The internet does not delete things. Screenshots had already spread across platforms, and the story — congressman publicly body-shames teenage girl activist; teenage girl activist turns congressman’s mockery into abortion fund — had the precise shape that the media cycle rewards. Clean narrative. Clear villain. Clear protagonist. A number that kept going up.

By the morning of August 10, the fundraising page had become something beyond what a single person running a Twitter account can manage. National outlets were calling. Donations were coming in from all fifty states. Olivia Julianna, who had built her political identity as a Gen-Z organizer within the machinery of the Democratic Party, was suddenly a different kind of story entirely — not an organizer, but a symbol, and symbols are harder to control than organizations.

She gave the interviews. She answered the questions about what it felt like to have a congressman target her appearance in a public forum. She said the things she was supposed to say, the things that were also true: that it was wrong, that it was a pattern, that he had done this kind of thing before, that the donations were going to real organizations doing real work for women in Texas who had no other options after SB 8 shut down most of the clinics in the state.

And then she said something else, something she kept coming back to in the days that followed, something that would have sounded contradictory if you hadn’t watched her face when she said it.

“It was the best thing that ever happened to my activism.”

She was talking about the mockery. About the congressman calling her “odious.” About the tweet he eventually deleted.

Here is the contradiction she did not explain, the one that exists in almost every public account of those seventy-two hours: Olivia Julianna says the cruelty was the best thing that happened to her activism, and yet she also says it hurt. Both things are true. She has said that being targeted for her body by someone with the platform of a U.S. congressman is not nothing, that it lands somewhere real, that there is no version of this where a teenager reads a tweet like that and feels nothing. She said she was furious. She said she cried. And then she also said it was the best thing that ever happened to her activism, and she said it with what looks, watching the footage, like genuine pleasure. The grief and the win are not reconciled in her public telling. They sit side by side, and she does not try to tidy that up.

The money that came in over those seventy-two hours did not represent, in most cases, individual major donors. It was small-dollar donations — $5, $25, $50 — from people who had heard about what happened, who were angry, who wanted somewhere to put the anger. The page gave them that. The page was, in that sense, not a fundraising mechanism so much as a redirect valve for collective rage, and collective rage, it turned out, was worth $2.1 million.

This is the number that rewrites the scene in that Houston bedroom on the night of August 9: $2.1 million. Read that number and then go back to the image of a nineteen-year-old sitting on her floor, watching $17,423 on a screen, not yet sleeping, phone vibrating, hitting refresh. She was not watching a small fundraising campaign. She was watching the opening seconds of something she had no framework for, because no framework existed. The record for a single viral abortion fundraising moment had not looked like this before. It looks like this now, because of a congressman who deleted a tweet that is still, functionally, everywhere.

What Actually Gets Built When a Moment Ends

The media cycle for a story like this is about a week, maybe ten days. Olivia Julianna’s story broke on August 9. By August 20, the volume of coverage had dropped significantly. By September, it had become a reference point rather than an active news story — something cited in pieces about Gen-Z activism, about the post-Dobbs political landscape, about what it looks like when social media and direct fundraising combine in the right conditions at the right moment.

What stayed was the money. The $2.1 million did not disappear when the news cycle moved on. It went to the Texas abortion funds that had been operating in increasingly difficult conditions since SB 8 took effect in September 2021. These were organizations staffed largely by volunteers, running on small budgets, helping women navigate what had become an extremely complicated logistical situation — traveling out of state, finding funding for travel, locating providers, managing the documentation of a health system that had split itself across state lines.

Olivia Julianna has described the experience of those seventy-two hours as transformative in a specific way: not because it made her famous, but because it showed her the scale of what was actually possible when the conditions were right. She had spent two years organizing — phone banking, canvassing, DNC appearances, the slow unglamorous work of political participation — and in seventy-two hours a congressman’s cruelty had generated more direct impact, financially, than most campaigns she had ever been part of.

She is, by all accounts, still processing what that means. The young woman who raised $2.1 million in three days did not retire from politics. She did not leverage the moment into a brand. She kept doing what she was doing before: organizing, posting, showing up. The fundraising page closed. The Twitter following stayed. The money arrived at the organizations that needed it and got spent on the work that needed doing, quietly, without additional press releases.

In Houston, someone kept the original screenshots. The fundraising page no longer shows $17,423. But somewhere in the archive of that bedroom, on a phone that hasn’t stopped vibrating since six o’clock, there is a version of that number that has not moved yet, the number before it became what it became, when it was still just a teenager on a floor watching a screen and not yet knowing anything about what came next.

“It was the best thing that ever happened to my activism” — said of the tweet a congressman deleted, by the girl who made it cost him $2.1 million. — Olivia Julianna, 2022
Sources & Further Reading
  1. Olivia Julianna, public Twitter statements and interviews, August 9–15, 2022. ActBlue campaign page, archived.
  2. The Guardian — “Olivia Julianna raises over $2m for abortion rights after Matt Gaetz mocks her appearance” (Aug. 12, 2022)
  3. The New York Times — Coverage of the fundraising campaign and Gaetz’s original tweet (Aug. 12, 2022)
  4. Vox — Analysis of the viral fundraising moment (Aug. 12, 2022)
  5. Texas SB 8 (Senate Bill 8), 87th Texas Legislature, signed September 1, 2021. Legislative reference.
  6. Democratic National Committee — archived public remarks, Olivia Julianna, 2021–2022.
  7. ActBlue platform data on small-dollar donation volumes, August 2022 (reported figures, various outlets).
James Whitfield
James Whitfield
Political analyst and journalist

James Whitfield is a political analyst and journalist covering British and international affairs. He studied Politics and International Relations at the University of Edinburgh before spending eight years reporting from Westminster for regional and national outlets. His work focuses on electoral trends, party strategy and the intersection of domestic policy with global events. James has contributed analysis to broadcast panels and political podcasts across the UK media landscape. He is based in London and writes regularly for ukpolitical.info.

Scroll to Top